Author Archives: Brian Easton

How Fair Is a Flat Tax?

Listener: 23 January, 1988 (Edited for length) Keywords: Distributional Economics; Regulation & Taxation; What is a flat tax on incomes? Income taxes are imposed on different categories of incomes at different rates. For instance, under the regime introduced in October 1986, at the same time the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was introduced, the first…
Continue reading this entry »

Market Incomes: Their Capacity to Deliver a Living Wage

A paper for the New Zealand Planning Council conference, “The Distribution of Income and Wealth in New Zealand”, by Brian Easton*   Keywords: Distributional Economics; Social Policy;   Probably the first text I ever read as an economics undergraduate was Tjalling Koopmans’ “Three Essays on the State of Economic Science” (1957). The book contains an…
Continue reading this entry »

Agriculture in New Zealand’s Economy

Wallace, L.T & R. Lattimore (eds) (1987) Rural New Zealand~ What Next? Agribusiness & Economics Research Unit, Lincoln College, Discussion Paper 109. Arguably, agriculture has been the single most important factor in shaping New Zealand’s economy. Yet the intricacies of its influence on the macroeconomy have not been fully explored.              Agriculture in New Zealand…
Continue reading this entry »

Valuing a Good Time, Dearie

Listener 30 May 1987.

Keywords: Regulation & Taxation;

I imagine that somewhere in the megaliths near the Beehive there is a memorandum advocating the decriminalisation of prostitution. It probably starts with the “general principle” that there should be no artificial barriers to the entry or exit of firms to the industry in New Zealand.

Economic Liberalisation: Where Do People Fit In?

Responding to the Revolution: Careers, culture and Casualties ed. A. von Tunzelmann & J. Johnston, (NZIPA, 1987), being the proceedings of the NZIPA 1987 conference. (pp.85-93)

Keywords: History of Ideas, Methodology & Philosophy; Social Policy;

Keynes remarked that practical men (he meant politicians, bureaucrats and businessmen) are but the slaves of some defunct economist, a sentiment that will have been all too apparent over the last few years. Today I want to focus upon some of these defunct economists, to show how economic analysis which is too narrowly directed results in policies for economic change which generate social costs far in excess of any ‘economic’ benefits.

In the Midst Of Plenty

Listener 14 December, 1985.

Keywords: Distributional Economics;

“At the time of the Bengal famine (in which over one and a half million people died), in 1943, I was a young boy in Bengal. I have a harrowing memory of an end]ess procession of emaciated men, women, and children -more like skeletons than human beings -trekking in search of food. And of the roads Jittered with corpses. One recalls families of labourers, fishermen and craftsmen – all of whom had lost their means of livelihood.

The Stagnation Of Nations

Listener: 16 November, 1985 Keywords: Political Economy & History; What determines the comparative growth performances of different economies? Some will tell you that it is the amount of labour and capital together, perhaps, with the technologies that are used. Mancur Olson provides a quite different explanation in his The Rise and Fall of Nations: Economic…
Continue reading this entry »

Challenges to the Comfortable

Listener: 22 December, 1984.

Keywords: Literature and Culture;

It is strange to recall the public outcry caused by the arrival of abstraction in painting. We now accept that form and colour are relevant and important. Abstract painting is now safe, for while it challenges us intellectually there is – as with landscapes – a distance between the picture and our human preoccupations. Where then does the painter af social realism, the commentator an our lives, fit in? Not in the boardroom or the living-room; paintings which glare at us, challenging the way we live, do. not belong in those places – do. they?

Confidentially Yours

Listener: 18 August, 1984.

Keywords: Governance; Growth & Innovation;

Sir Robert said he had learned after his many years in dealing with Treasury to beware of calls for quick change, because official reports rarely paid sufficient heed to the social consequences of economic change. ” (Evening Post July 18, 1984)